The two ways this goes wrong
There are exactly two failure modes and they are not symmetrical. Price too high and you learn something: nobody signs up, and you find out cheaply that the value you imagined was imaginary. Price too low and you learn nothing at all — signups arrive, they feel like validation, and you have proven only that people will take something for less than it costs to make.
The asymmetry matters because the cheap mistake is the one that feels safe. Founders round down out of politeness. Then fifty people sign up at nine dollars, the idea gets built, and the arithmetic that was never going to work is discovered in month seven with a product attached to it.
So the discipline below is mostly a defence against your own instinct to be liked. It produces a number you can say out loud to a stranger, and a written record of why, which is the part that survives the moment you get nervous.
Six steps, in this order
The order is load-bearing. Doing step five before step two produces a number that flatters whatever you already wanted to charge.
- 1
Find what the problem costs the buyer per month, in their units
Not in yours. If they lose four hours a month, price against four hours of their time, at their rate, not yours. If they lose money directly — a late invoice, a chargeback, a no-show — find the actual amount and write it down with its source.
A designer billing $60/hour who loses three hours a month to chasing invoices is losing $180 a month. That is the ceiling of the conversation, and it is a much better anchor than any competitor's price.
- 2
Take between five and fifteen percent of that
This is the band where software that removes a specific, measurable cost tends to be bought without a business case. Below five percent you are leaving money on the table and signalling that the problem is trivial. Above fifteen and the buyer starts doing arithmetic, which means a decision, which means a delay.
$180 a month of lost time puts the band at $9 to $27. This is a heuristic from watching where small tools cluster, not a law, and the band moves for products that touch revenue rather than time.
- 3
Check the two nearest incumbents on their own pricing page, today
Open the page. Read the entry tier. Note the date. Prices change quietly and a comparison built on a remembered number is worse than no comparison, because it is confidently wrong.
You are not looking for a number to undercut. You are looking for the shape of the market: whether it is priced per seat, per volume, or flat, and whether the entry tier is real or a decoy for the tier above.
- 4
Decide whether you are cheaper, dearer, or elsewhere
Cheaper is the worst of the three and the most popular. It invites a price war you cannot win and attracts the buyers most likely to leave. Dearer requires a reason a stranger can repeat in one sentence. Elsewhere — priced on a different unit entirely — is usually where a small product should live.
"Flat, not per seat" and "per project, not per month" are both elsewhere. They make direct comparison awkward, which is the point.
- 5
Write the number, then write the sentence that defends it
One sentence, no adjectives, addressed to a sceptic. If you cannot write it without using the words powerful or comprehensive, the number is not defensible yet and the copy is doing work the price should be doing.
A working example: "Twenty-nine dollars a month, flat, because it replaces about four hours of manual reconciliation and four hours is worth more than that to anyone who has the problem."
- 6
Add a founder price, and hold it
Roughly half, offered to people who commit before the product exists. It is the only thing you can honestly promise pre-launch, because it costs you nothing today and it is entirely within your control to honour.
Hold it for the life of the account rather than for twelve months. A twelve-month founder price is a discount; a permanent one is a reason to sign up now, and the difference in signal is large.
Six steps, two of which are just reading a competitor's pricing page carefully. It takes an afternoon.
The arithmetic, run on four of the ideas on this site
Each row is a real idea listed on this domain, with the number it was priced at and the reasoning that produced it.
| Idea | Monthly cost of the problem (est.) | Five to fifteen percent band | Price chosen | Why it sits there |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late Invoice Nudges | $180 — three hours of a $60/hr freelancer | $9 – $27 | $19 | Middle of the band; the buyer is price-sensitive and solo |
| Chargeback Evidence Pack | $600 — two disputes a month at $300 average | $30 – $90 | $29 | Deliberately under the band, because the value is lumpy and disputed months are irregular |
| A11y Regression Watch | $1,200 — one audit round-trip a quarter, amortised | $60 – $180 | $39 | Well under the band; the buyer is an agency that already pays for an audit and resents paying twice |
| Pix Reconciliation | R$400 — five hours of an admin's month | R$20 – R$60 | R$39 | Middle of the band, in local currency, because the buyer earns in local currency |
Source: Cost figures are our own estimates built from the hourly rates and dispute values cited on each idea's research page. They are not survey data and should be read as order-of-magnitude.
Two of the four sit below their own band. That is a choice, not a mistake — but it is a choice that has to be made deliberately and written down, or it becomes a habit.
Questions that come up every time
Should I show the price at all, or ask people what they would pay?
What if I get the price wrong?
Free tier or no free tier?
Per seat, per usage, or flat?
How much lower should the founder price be?
Fifteen prices, each one arrived at this way
Every idea on this domain has a published price and a research page showing the incumbent numbers it was set against.